In Rust, the Xeon E5-2620 v2 is quite a bit slower than the Ryzen 7 7800X3D. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Xeon E5-2620 v2
- Consumes up to 33% less energy – 80 vs 120 Watts
- Consumes up to 33% less energy
Ryzen 7 7800X3D
- Up to 43% faster in Rust – 297 vs 208 FPS
- Up to 43% faster in Rust
- Is 9 years and 4 months newer – Jan 04, 2023 vs Sep 01, 2013
- Is 9 years and 4 months newer
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Rust FPS Calculator
Xeon E5-2620 v2 vs Ryzen 7 7800X3D: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Ryzen 7 7800X3D
Jan 4th, 2023
Average FPS
297 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
103 FPS
100%
Price, $
$399
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.34/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E5-2620 v2 vs Ryzen 7 7800X3D in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E5-2620 v2 vs Ryzen 7 7800X3D in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E5-2620 v2
Sep 1st, 2013
Cores
6-core
75%
L3 Cache
15 MB
16%
Base Frequency
2.1 GHz
50%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Ryzen 7 7800X3D
Jan 4th, 2023
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
96 MB
100%
Base Frequency
4.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E5-2620 v2 Sep 1st, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen 7 7800X3D Jan 4th, 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| – | MSRP | $449.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA2011 | Socket | AM5 |
80W | Power Consumption | 120W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 5200 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | Radeon Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
