In Atomfall, the Xeon E5-2620 v2 is slower than the Core Ultra 5 245KF. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Xeon E5-2620 v2
- Consumes up to 36% less energy – 80 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 36% less energy
Core Ultra 5 245KF
- Up to 30% faster in Atomfall – 246 vs 189 FPS
- Up to 30% faster in Atomfall
- Is 11 years and 1 month newer – Oct 24, 2024 vs Sep 01, 2013
- Is 11 years and 1 month newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Xeon E5-2620 v2 vs Core Ultra 5 245KF: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core Ultra 5 245KF
Oct 24th, 2024
Average FPS
246 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
184 FPS
100%
Price, $
$214.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.87/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E5-2620 v2 vs Core Ultra 5 245KF in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E5-2620 v2 vs Core Ultra 5 245KF in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E5-2620 v2
Sep 1st, 2013
Cores
6-core
43%
L3 Cache
15 MB
62%
Base Frequency
2.1 GHz
50%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core Ultra 5 245KF
Oct 24th, 2024
Cores
14-core
100%
L3 Cache
24 MB
100%
Base Frequency
4.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
6400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E5-2620 v2 Sep 1st, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core Ultra 5 245KF Oct 24th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 1st, 2013 | Released | Oct 24th, 2024 |
| – | MSRP | $294.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA2011 | Socket | LGA1851 |
80 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 6400 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
