In Minecraft, the Xeon E5-2620 v2 is slightly slower than the Core i5-13400F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Xeon E5-2620 v2
No clear advantages
Core i5-13400F
- Up to 6% faster in Minecraft – 1125 vs 1059 FPS
- Up to 6% faster in Minecraft
- Is 9 years and 4 months newer – Jan 04, 2023 vs Sep 01, 2013
- Is 9 years and 4 months newer
- Consumes up to 19% less energy – 65 vs 80 Watts
- Consumes up to 19% less energy
Minecraft FPS Calculator
Xeon E5-2620 v2 vs Core i5-13400F: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E5-2620 v2 vs Core i5-13400F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E5-2620 v2 vs Core i5-13400F in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E5-2620 v2
Sep 1st, 2013
Cores
6-core
60%
L3 Cache
15 MB
75%
Base Frequency
2.1 GHz
84%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i5-13400F
Jan 4th, 2023
Cores
10-core
100%
L3 Cache
20 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E5-2620 v2 Sep 1st, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-13400F Jan 4th, 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| – | MSRP | $196.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA2011 | Socket | LGA1700 |
| 80W | Power Consumption | 65W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
