In Dead Space, the Xeon E5-2620 v2 is slightly slower than the Core i3-12300T. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Xeon E5-2620 v2
No clear advantages
Core i3-12300T
- Up to 2% faster in Dead Space – 178 vs 175 FPS
- Up to 2% faster in Dead Space
- Is 8 years and 4 months newer – Jan 14, 2022 vs Sep 01, 2013
- Is 8 years and 4 months newer
- Consumes up to 56% less energy – 35 vs 80 Watts
- Consumes up to 56% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Dead Space FPS Calculator
Xeon E5-2620 v2 vs Core i3-12300T: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E5-2620 v2 vs Core i3-12300T in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E5-2620 v2 vs Core i3-12300T in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E5-2620 v2
Sep 1st, 2013
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
15 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.1 GHz
91%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i3-12300T
Jan 14th, 2022
Cores
4-core
67%
L3 Cache
12 MB
80%
Base Frequency
2.3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E5-2620 v2 Sep 1st, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-12300T Jan 14th, 2022 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 1st, 2013 | Released | Jan 14th, 2022 |
| – | MSRP | $97.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA2011 | Socket | LGA1700 |
| 80 W | Power Consumption | 35 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 730 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
