In Rust, the Xeon E5-2609 is slightly slower than the Ryzen Threadripper 2920X. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Xeon E5-2609
- Consumes up to 56% less energy – 80 vs 180 Watts
- Consumes up to 56% less energy
Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Up to 9% faster in Rust – 226 vs 208 FPS
- Up to 9% faster in Rust
- Is 6 years and 6 months newer – Oct 03, 2018 vs Mar 06, 2012
- Is 6 years and 6 months newer
Rust FPS Calculator
Xeon E5-2609 vs Ryzen Threadripper 2920X: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
Oct 3rd, 2018
Average FPS
226 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
55 FPS
100%
Price, $
$229.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.01/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E5-2609 vs Ryzen Threadripper 2920X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E5-2609 vs Ryzen Threadripper 2920X in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E5-2609
Mar 6th, 2012
Cores
4-core
33%
L3 Cache
10 MB
31%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
69%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
Oct 3rd, 2018
Cores
12-core
100%
L3 Cache
32 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E5-2609 Mar 6th, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen Threadripper 2920X Oct 3rd, 2018 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
| – | MSRP | $649.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA2011 | Socket | SP3r2 |
80W | Power Consumption | 180W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 2933 MHz (DDR4) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
