The Xeon E5-2609 is at least 2x slower gaming CPU than the Ryzen 7 5800X. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Xeon E5-2609
- Consumes up to 24% less energy – 80 vs 105 Watts
Advantages of the Ryzen 7 5800X
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 16 vs 4 threads
Xeon E5-2609 vs Ryzen 7 5800X for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Xeon E5-2609
Mar 6th, 2012
Average FPS
166
82%
Min 1% FPS
112
84%
Price, $
Out of Stock
Value, $/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Ryzen 7 5800X
Nov 5th, 2020
Average FPS
203
100%
Min 1% FPS
134
100%
Price, $
$173
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.85/FPS
100%
Xeon E5-2609 vs Ryzen 7 5800X in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E5-2609 vs Ryzen 7 5800X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E5-2609 vs Ryzen 7 5800X in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E5-2609
Mar 6th, 2012
Cores
4-core
50%
L3 Cache
10 MB
31%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
63%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Ryzen 7 5800X
Nov 5th, 2020
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
32 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Xeon E5-2609 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Ryzen 7 5800X |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Nov 5th, 2020 |
Not Available | MSRP | $449.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Vermeer |
80 W | Power Consumption | 105 W |
Performance | ||
4 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
2.4 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Frequency | 4.7 GHz |
10 MB | L3 Cache | 32 MB |
Other Features | ||
DDR3 | RAM | DDR4 @ 3200 MHz |
No | Integrated Graphics | No |
No | Overclockable | Yes |