In Rust, the Xeon E5-2609 is slower than the Core Ultra 7 265F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Xeon E5-2609
No clear advantages
Core Ultra 7 265F
- Up to 33% faster in Rust – 277 vs 208 FPS
- Up to 33% faster in Rust
- Is 12 years and 10 months newer – Jan 07, 2025 vs Mar 06, 2012
- Is 12 years and 10 months newer
- Consumes up to 19% less energy – 65 vs 80 Watts
- Consumes up to 19% less energy
Rust FPS Calculator
Xeon E5-2609 vs Core Ultra 7 265F: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core Ultra 7 265F
Jan 7th, 2025
Average FPS
277 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
90 FPS
100%
Price, $
$269
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.97/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E5-2609 vs Core Ultra 7 265F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E5-2609 vs Core Ultra 7 265F in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E5-2609
Mar 6th, 2012
Cores
4-core
20%
L3 Cache
10 MB
33%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core Ultra 7 265F
Jan 7th, 2025
Cores
20-core
100%
L3 Cache
30 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
6400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E5-2609 Mar 6th, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core Ultra 7 265F Jan 7th, 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 7th, 2025 |
| – | MSRP | $379.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA2011 | Socket | LGA1851 |
| 80W | Power Consumption | 65W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 6400 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
