In Deathloop, the Xeon E5-2609 is slightly slower than the Core i7-14700F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Xeon E5-2609
No clear advantages
Core i7-14700F
- Up to 8% faster in Deathloop – 239 vs 222 FPS
- Up to 8% faster in Deathloop
- Is 11 years and 10 months newer – Jan 08, 2024 vs Mar 06, 2012
- Is 11 years and 10 months newer
- Consumes up to 19% less energy – 65 vs 80 Watts
- Consumes up to 19% less energy
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Xeon E5-2609 vs Core i7-14700F: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i7-14700F
Jan 8th, 2024
Average FPS
239 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
179 FPS
100%
Price, $
$302.97
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.26/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E5-2609 vs Core i7-14700F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E5-2609 vs Core i7-14700F in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E5-2609
Mar 6th, 2012
Cores
4-core
20%
L3 Cache
10 MB
30%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i7-14700F
Jan 8th, 2024
Cores
20-core
100%
L3 Cache
33 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.1 GHz
88%
Turbo Frequency
5.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E5-2609 Mar 6th, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-14700F Jan 8th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| – | MSRP | $359.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA2011 | Socket | LGA1700 |
| 80W | Power Consumption | 65W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
