In Control, the Xeon E5-2609 is slightly slower than the Core i5-14400F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Xeon E5-2609
No clear advantages
Core i5-14400F
- Up to 3% faster in Control – 252 vs 245 FPS
- Up to 3% faster in Control
- Is 11 years and 10 months newer – Jan 08, 2024 vs Mar 06, 2012
- Is 11 years and 10 months newer
- Consumes up to 19% less energy – 65 vs 80 Watts
- Consumes up to 19% less energy
Control FPS Calculator
Xeon E5-2609 vs Core i5-14400F: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i5-14400F
Jan 8th, 2024
Average FPS
252 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
165 FPS
100%
Price, $
$224.17
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.88/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E5-2609 vs Core i5-14400F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E5-2609 vs Core i5-14400F in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E5-2609
Mar 6th, 2012
Cores
4-core
40%
L3 Cache
10 MB
50%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
96%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i5-14400F
Jan 8th, 2024
Cores
10-core
100%
L3 Cache
20 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E5-2609 Mar 6th, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-14400F Jan 8th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| – | MSRP | $196.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA2011 | Socket | LGA1700 |
| 80W | Power Consumption | 65W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
