In The Last of Us Part II, the Xeon E5-2609 v3 is slightly faster than the Ryzen 5 9600X. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Xeon E5-2609 v3
- Up to 14% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 194 vs 170 FPS
- Up to 14% faster in The Last of Us Part II
Ryzen 5 9600X
- Is 9 years and 11 months newer – Aug 08, 2024 vs Sep 08, 2014
- Is 9 years and 11 months newer
- Consumes up to 24% less energy – 65 vs 85 Watts
- Consumes up to 24% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Xeon E5-2609 v3 vs Ryzen 5 9600X: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Ryzen 5 9600X
Aug 8th, 2024
Average FPS
170 FPS
88%
Min 1% FPS
128 FPS
88%
Price, $
$194
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.14/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E5-2609 v3 vs Ryzen 5 9600X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E5-2609 v3 vs Ryzen 5 9600X in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E5-2609 v3
Sep 8th, 2014
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
15 MB
47%
Base Frequency
1.9 GHz
49%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
29%
Ryzen 5 9600X
Aug 8th, 2024
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
32 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.9 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E5-2609 v3 Sep 8th, 2014 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen 5 9600X Aug 8th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 8th, 2014 | Released | Aug 8th, 2024 |
| $306.00 | MSRP | $279.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA2011-3 | Socket | AM5 |
| 85 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1600 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | Radeon Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
