Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 5700X3D outperforms Xeon E5-2609 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 5700X3D is 3781 days newer than Xeon E5-2609 v2.
Advantages of Xeon E5-2609 v2
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D - 80 vs 105 Watts
Advantages of Ryzen 7 5700X3D
- Performs up to 17% better in Elden Ring than Xeon E5-2609 v2 - 127 vs 109 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2609 v2 - 16 vs 4 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Xeon E5-2609 v2
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Ryzen 7 5700X3D
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-2609 v2 | vs | Ryzen 7 5700X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Not Available |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 8 |
| 4 | Threads | 16 |
| 2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
| 2.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 105 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
| 25.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
