In Deathloop, the Xeon E5-2430 is slightly faster than the Ryzen Threadripper 1920X. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Xeon E5-2430
- Up to 1% faster in Deathloop – 221 vs 219 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in Deathloop
- Consumes up to 47% less energy – 95 vs 180 Watts
- Consumes up to 47% less energy
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Is 5 years and 2 months newer – Aug 10, 2017 vs May 14, 2012
- Is 5 years and 2 months newer
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Xeon E5-2430 vs Ryzen Threadripper 1920X: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
Aug 10th, 2017
Average FPS
219 FPS
99%
Min 1% FPS
164 FPS
99%
Price, $
$199.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.91/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E5-2430 vs Ryzen Threadripper 1920X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E5-2430 vs Ryzen Threadripper 1920X in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E5-2430
May 14th, 2012
Cores
6-core
50%
L3 Cache
15 MB
47%
Base Frequency
2.2 GHz
63%
Turbo Frequency
2.7 GHz
68%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
Aug 10th, 2017
Cores
12-core
100%
L3 Cache
32 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E5-2430 May 14th, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen Threadripper 1920X Aug 10th, 2017 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| May 14th, 2012 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
| – | MSRP | $799.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1356 | Socket | SP3r2 |
95W | Power Consumption | 180W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
