In Battlefield 6, the Xeon E5-2430 is quite a bit slower than the Ryzen 9 5900X. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Xeon E5-2430
- Consumes up to 10% less energy – 95 vs 105 Watts
- Consumes up to 10% less energy
Ryzen 9 5900X
- Up to 70% faster in Battlefield 6 – 104 vs 61 FPS
- Up to 70% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 8 years and 5 months newer – Nov 05, 2020 vs May 14, 2012
- Is 8 years and 5 months newer
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Xeon E5-2430 vs Ryzen 9 5900X: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Ryzen 9 5900X
Nov 5th, 2020
Average FPS
104 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
78 FPS
100%
Price, $
$269
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.58/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E5-2430 vs Ryzen 9 5900X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E5-2430 vs Ryzen 9 5900X in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E5-2430
May 14th, 2012
Cores
6-core
50%
L3 Cache
15 MB
23%
Base Frequency
2.2 GHz
59%
Turbo Frequency
2.7 GHz
56%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Ryzen 9 5900X
Nov 5th, 2020
Cores
12-core
100%
L3 Cache
64 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E5-2430 May 14th, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen 9 5900X Nov 5th, 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| May 14th, 2012 | Released | Nov 5th, 2020 |
| – | MSRP | $549.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1356 | Socket | AM4 |
95 W | Power Consumption | 105 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
