Key Differences
In short — Core i3-12100F outperforms Xeon E5-2420 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-12100F is 3543 days newer than Xeon E5-2420.
Advantages of Core i3-12100F
- Performs up to 24% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Xeon E5-2420 - 205 vs 165 FPS
- Consumes up to 39% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2420 - 58 vs 95 Watts
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
FPS
205
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.37/FPS
100%
Price, $
$76.8
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $76.8 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 242 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Server/Workstation • May 14th, 2012
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-2420 | vs | Core i3-12100F |
---|---|---|
May 14th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 25th, 2022 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Sandy Bridge-EN | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1356 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
1.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
2.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 58 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |