In The Last of Us Part II, the Xeon E5-1680 v4 is slightly faster than the Core Ultra 9 285. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Xeon E5-1680 v4
- Up to 3% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 175 vs 170 FPS
- Up to 3% faster in The Last of Us Part II
Core Ultra 9 285
- Is 8 years and 6 months newer – Jan 14, 2025 vs Jun 20, 2016
- Is 8 years and 6 months newer
- Consumes up to 54% less energy – 65 vs 140 Watts
- Consumes up to 54% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Xeon E5-1680 v4 vs Core Ultra 9 285: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core Ultra 9 285
Jan 14th, 2025
Average FPS
170 FPS
97%
Min 1% FPS
127 FPS
97%
Price, $
$563.41
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.31/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E5-1680 v4 vs Core Ultra 9 285 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E5-1680 v4 vs Core Ultra 9 285 in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E5-1680 v4
Jun 20th, 2016
Cores
8-core
33%
L3 Cache
20 MB
56%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
71%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
38%
Core Ultra 9 285
Jan 14th, 2025
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
74%
Turbo Frequency
5.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
6400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E5-1680 v4 Jun 20th, 2016 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core Ultra 9 285 Jan 14th, 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jun 20th, 2016 | Released | Jan 14th, 2025 |
| $1,723.00 | MSRP | $579.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA2011-3 | Socket | LGA1851 |
| 140 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2400 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 6400 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
