In Deathloop, the Xeon E5-1680 v2 is slightly slower than the Xeon E3-1230. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Xeon E5-1680 v2
- Is 2 years and 5 months newer – Sep 10, 2013 vs Apr 03, 2011
- Is 2 years and 5 months newer
Xeon E3-1230
- Up to 1% faster in Deathloop – 220 vs 218 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in Deathloop
- Consumes up to 38% less energy – 80 vs 130 Watts
- Consumes up to 38% less energy
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Xeon E5-1680 v2 vs Xeon E3-1230: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E5-1680 v2 vs Xeon E3-1230 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E5-1680 v2 vs Xeon E3-1230 in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E5-1680 v2
Sep 10th, 2013
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
25 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3 GHz
94%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
100%
Xeon E3-1230
Apr 3rd, 2011
Cores
4-core
50%
L3 Cache
8 MB
32%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.6 GHz
92%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E5-1680 v2 Sep 10th, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon E3-1230 Apr 3rd, 2011 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Sep 10th, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2011 |
| $1,723.00 | MSRP | – |
Server | Segment | Server |
| LGA2011 | Socket | LGA1155 |
| 130W | Power Consumption | 80W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1866 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | DDR3 |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
