In Rust, the Xeon E5-1680 v2 is slightly faster than the Core i3-3220T. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Xeon E5-1680 v2
- Up to 3% faster in Rust – 215 vs 209 FPS
- Up to 3% faster in Rust
- Is 1 year and 6 days newer – Sep 10, 2013 vs Sep 03, 2012
- Is 1 year and 6 days newer
Core i3-3220T
- Consumes up to 73% less energy – 35 vs 130 Watts
- Consumes up to 73% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Rust FPS Calculator
Xeon E5-1680 v2 vs Core i3-3220T: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i3-3220T
Sep 3rd, 2012
Average FPS
209 FPS
97%
Min 1% FPS
41 FPS
89%
Price, $
$189.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.9/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E5-1680 v2 vs Core i3-3220T in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E5-1680 v2 vs Core i3-3220T in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E5-1680 v2
Sep 10th, 2013
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
25 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
100%
Core i3-3220T
Sep 3rd, 2012
Cores
2-core
25%
L3 Cache
3 MB
12%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
93%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E5-1680 v2 Sep 10th, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-3220T Sep 3rd, 2012 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Sep 10th, 2013 | Released | Sep 3rd, 2012 |
| $1,723.00 | MSRP | – |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA2011 | Socket | LGA1155 |
| 130 W | Power Consumption | 35 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1866 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | DDR3 |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | Intel HD 2500 |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
