In Deathloop, the Xeon E5-1680 v2 is slightly slower than the Core i3-14100. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Xeon E5-1680 v2
No clear advantages
Core i3-14100
- Up to 5% faster in Deathloop – 229 vs 218 FPS
- Up to 5% faster in Deathloop
- Is 10 years and 3 months newer – Jan 08, 2024 vs Sep 10, 2013
- Is 10 years and 3 months newer
- Consumes up to 54% less energy – 60 vs 130 Watts
- Consumes up to 54% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Xeon E5-1680 v2 vs Core i3-14100: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i3-14100
Jan 8th, 2024
Average FPS
229 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
172 FPS
100%
Price, $
$149.35
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.65/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E5-1680 v2 vs Core i3-14100 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E5-1680 v2 vs Core i3-14100 in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E5-1680 v2
Sep 10th, 2013
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
25 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3 GHz
86%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
83%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
39%
Core i3-14100
Jan 8th, 2024
Cores
4-core
50%
L3 Cache
12 MB
48%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E5-1680 v2 Sep 10th, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-14100 Jan 8th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 10th, 2013 | Released | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| $1,723.00 | MSRP | $134.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA2011 | Socket | LGA1700 |
| 130 W | Power Consumption | 60 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1866 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 730 |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
