Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7950X outperforms the cheaper Xeon E5-1660 v4 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Xeon E5-1660 v4 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X is 2290 days newer than the cheaper Xeon E5-1660 v4.
Advantages of Xeon E5-1660 v4
- Up to 30% cheaper than Ryzen 9 7950X - $352.36 vs $500.88
- Up to 18% better value when playing Escape From Tarkov than Ryzen 9 7950X - $1.74 vs $2.12 per FPS
- Consumes up to 18% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7950X - 140 vs 170 Watts
Advantages of Ryzen 9 7950X
- Performs up to 16% better in Escape From Tarkov than Xeon E5-1660 v4 - 236 vs 203 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1660 v4 - 32 vs 16 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1660 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Escape From Tarkov
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
FPS
203
86%
Value, $/FPS
$1.74/FPS
100%
Price, $
$352.36
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $352.36 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
236
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.12/FPS
82%
Price, $
$500.88
70%
FPS Winner
Buy for $500.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-1660 v4 | vs | Ryzen 9 7950X |
---|---|---|
Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Broadwell | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 16 |
16 | Threads | 32 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.7 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 170 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 45.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |