In Deathloop, the Xeon E5-1660 v2 is slightly slower than the Core i3-14100F and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's $193 more expensive!
Xeon E5-1660 v2
No clear advantages
Core i3-14100F
- Up to 6% faster in Deathloop – 230 vs 218 FPS
- Up to 6% faster in Deathloop
- Is 10 years and 3 months newer – Jan 08, 2024 vs Sep 10, 2013
- Is 10 years and 3 months newer
- Up to 67% cheaper – $96.99 vs $289.95
- Up to 67% cheaper
- Up to 68% better value in Deathloop – $0.42 vs $1.33/FPS
- Up to 68% better value in Deathloop
- Consumes up to 55% less energy – 58 vs 130 Watts
- Consumes up to 55% less energy
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Xeon E5-1660 v2 vs Core i3-14100F: Comparison of performance and price
Xeon E5-1660 v2
Sep 10th, 2013
Average FPS
218 FPS
95%
Min 1% FPS
164 FPS
95%
Price, $
$289.95
33%
Value, $/FPS
$1.33/FPS
32%
Core i3-14100F
Jan 8th, 2024
Average FPS
230 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
172 FPS
100%
Price, $
$96.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.42/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E5-1660 v2 vs Core i3-14100F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E5-1660 v2 vs Core i3-14100F in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E5-1660 v2
Sep 10th, 2013
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
15 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
85%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
39%
Core i3-14100F
Jan 8th, 2024
Cores
4-core
67%
L3 Cache
12 MB
80%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
95%
Turbo Frequency
4.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E5-1660 v2 Sep 10th, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-14100F Jan 8th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 10th, 2013 | Released | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| – | MSRP | $109.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA2011 | Socket | LGA1700 |
| 130 W | Power Consumption | 58 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1866 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
