In Deathloop, the Xeon E5-1650 is slightly slower than the Ryzen Threadripper 3990X. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $2270 cheaper!
Xeon E5-1650
- Up to 91% cheaper – $229.95 vs $2499.98
- Up to 91% cheaper
- Up to 91% better value in Deathloop – $1.05 vs $11.16/FPS
- Up to 91% better value in Deathloop
- Consumes up to 54% less energy – 130 vs 280 Watts
- Consumes up to 54% less energy
Ryzen Threadripper 3990X
- Up to 2% faster in Deathloop – 224 vs 219 FPS
- Up to 2% faster in Deathloop
- Is 7 years and 11 months newer – Feb 07, 2020 vs Mar 06, 2012
- Is 7 years and 11 months newer
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Xeon E5-1650 vs Ryzen Threadripper 3990X: Comparison of performance and price
Xeon E5-1650
Mar 6th, 2012
Average FPS
219 FPS
98%
Min 1% FPS
164 FPS
98%
Price, $
$229.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.05/FPS
100%
Ryzen Threadripper 3990X
Feb 7th, 2020
Average FPS
224 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
168 FPS
100%
Price, $
$2499.98
9%
Value, $/FPS
$11.16/FPS
9%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E5-1650 vs Ryzen Threadripper 3990X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E5-1650 vs Ryzen Threadripper 3990X in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E5-1650
Mar 6th, 2012
Cores
6-core
9%
L3 Cache
12 MB
5%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.8 GHz
88%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Ryzen Threadripper 3990X
Feb 7th, 2020
Cores
64-core
100%
L3 Cache
256 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
91%
Turbo Frequency
4.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E5-1650 Mar 6th, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen Threadripper 3990X Feb 7th, 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Feb 7th, 2020 |
| – | MSRP | $3,990.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA2011 | Socket | TRX4 |
130W | Power Consumption | 280W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
