In Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0, the Xeon E5-1650 is slightly faster than the Ryzen 7 3700X. However, it's a slightly worse value for money, as it's $32 more expensive!
Xeon E5-1650
- Up to 3% faster in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 – 255 vs 247 FPS
- Up to 3% faster in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Ryzen 7 3700X
- Is 7 years and 4 months newer – Jul 07, 2019 vs Mar 06, 2012
- Is 7 years and 4 months newer
- Up to 14% cheaper – $198.00 vs $229.95
- Up to 14% cheaper
- Up to 11% better value in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 – $0.80 vs $0.90/FPS
- Up to 11% better value in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
- Consumes up to 50% less energy – 65 vs 130 Watts
- Consumes up to 50% less energy
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 FPS Calculator
Xeon E5-1650 vs Ryzen 7 3700X: Comparison of performance and price
Xeon E5-1650
Mar 6th, 2012
Average FPS
255 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
191 FPS
100%
Price, $
$229.95
86%
Value, $/FPS
$0.9/FPS
89%
Ryzen 7 3700X
Jul 7th, 2019
Average FPS
247 FPS
97%
Min 1% FPS
185 FPS
97%
Price, $
$198
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.8/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E5-1650 vs Ryzen 7 3700X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E5-1650 vs Ryzen 7 3700X in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E5-1650
Mar 6th, 2012
Cores
6-core
75%
L3 Cache
12 MB
38%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
89%
Turbo Frequency
3.8 GHz
86%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Ryzen 7 3700X
Jul 7th, 2019
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
32 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E5-1650 Mar 6th, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen 7 3700X Jul 7th, 2019 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Mar 6th, 2012 | Released | Jul 7th, 2019 |
| – | MSRP | $329.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA2011 | Socket | AM4 |
| 130 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
