In Rust, the Xeon E5-1650 is slower than the Core Ultra 7 265F and it's also a slightly worse value for money, as it's only $58 cheaper!
Xeon E5-1650
- Up to 20% cheaper – $229.95 vs $288.00
- Up to 20% cheaper
Core Ultra 7 265F
- Up to 31% faster in Rust – 278 vs 212 FPS
- Up to 31% faster in Rust
- Is 12 years and 10 months newer – Jan 07, 2025 vs Mar 06, 2012
- Is 12 years and 10 months newer
- Up to 5% better value in Rust – $1.03 vs $1.08/FPS
- Up to 5% better value in Rust
- Consumes up to 50% less energy – 65 vs 130 Watts
- Consumes up to 50% less energy
Rust FPS Calculator
Xeon E5-1650 vs Core Ultra 7 265F: Comparison of performance and price
Xeon E5-1650
Mar 6th, 2012
Average FPS
212 FPS
76%
Min 1% FPS
43 FPS
48%
Price, $
$229.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.08/FPS
95%
Core Ultra 7 265F
Jan 7th, 2025
Average FPS
278 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
90 FPS
100%
Price, $
$288
79%
Value, $/FPS
$1.03/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E5-1650 vs Core Ultra 7 265F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E5-1650 vs Core Ultra 7 265F in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E5-1650
Mar 6th, 2012
Cores
6-core
30%
L3 Cache
12 MB
40%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.8 GHz
72%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core Ultra 7 265F
Jan 7th, 2025
Cores
20-core
100%
L3 Cache
30 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
75%
Turbo Frequency
5.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
6400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E5-1650 Mar 6th, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core Ultra 7 265F Jan 7th, 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Mar 6th, 2012 | Released | Jan 7th, 2025 |
| – | MSRP | $379.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA2011 | Socket | LGA1851 |
| 130 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 6400 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
