In Deathloop, the Xeon E5-1650 is slightly slower than the Core i9-14900KF. However, it's a better value for money, as it's $200 cheaper!
Xeon E5-1650
- Up to 47% cheaper – $229.95 vs $429.99
- Up to 47% cheaper
- Up to 40% better value in Deathloop – $1.05 vs $1.76/FPS
- Up to 40% better value in Deathloop
Core i9-14900KF
- Up to 11% faster in Deathloop – 244 vs 219 FPS
- Up to 11% faster in Deathloop
- Is 11 years and 7 months newer – Oct 17, 2023 vs Mar 06, 2012
- Is 11 years and 7 months newer
- Consumes up to 4% less energy – 125 vs 130 Watts
- Consumes up to 4% less energy
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Xeon E5-1650 vs Core i9-14900KF: Comparison of performance and price
Xeon E5-1650
Mar 6th, 2012
Average FPS
219 FPS
90%
Min 1% FPS
164 FPS
90%
Price, $
$229.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.05/FPS
100%
Core i9-14900KF
Oct 17th, 2023
Average FPS
244 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
183 FPS
100%
Price, $
$429.99
53%
Value, $/FPS
$1.76/FPS
60%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E5-1650 vs Core i9-14900KF in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E5-1650 vs Core i9-14900KF in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E5-1650
Mar 6th, 2012
Cores
6-core
25%
L3 Cache
12 MB
33%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.8 GHz
63%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i9-14900KF
Oct 17th, 2023
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E5-1650 Mar 6th, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-14900KF Oct 17th, 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Mar 6th, 2012 | Released | Oct 17th, 2023 |
| – | MSRP | $564.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA2011 | Socket | LGA1700 |
| 130 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
