In Control, the Xeon E5-1650 is slightly slower than the Core i5-11400F and it's also a worse value for money, as it's $27 more expensive!
Xeon E5-1650
No clear advantages
Core i5-11400F
- Up to 2% faster in Control – 251 vs 246 FPS
- Up to 2% faster in Control
- Is 9 years and 9 days newer – Mar 16, 2021 vs Mar 06, 2012
- Is 9 years and 9 days newer
- Up to 12% cheaper – $203.16 vs $229.95
- Up to 12% cheaper
- Up to 14% better value in Control – $0.80 vs $0.93/FPS
- Up to 14% better value in Control
- Consumes up to 50% less energy – 65 vs 130 Watts
- Consumes up to 50% less energy
Control FPS Calculator
Xeon E5-1650 vs Core i5-11400F: Comparison of performance and price
Xeon E5-1650
Mar 6th, 2012
Average FPS
246 FPS
98%
Min 1% FPS
161 FPS
98%
Price, $
$229.95
88%
Value, $/FPS
$0.93/FPS
86%
Core i5-11400F
Mar 16th, 2021
Average FPS
251 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
164 FPS
100%
Price, $
$203.16
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.8/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E5-1650 vs Core i5-11400F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E5-1650 vs Core i5-11400F in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E5-1650
Mar 6th, 2012
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.8 GHz
86%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i5-11400F
Mar 16th, 2021
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.6 GHz
81%
Turbo Frequency
4.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E5-1650 Mar 6th, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-11400F Mar 16th, 2021 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Mar 6th, 2012 | Released | Mar 16th, 2021 |
| – | MSRP | $157.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA2011 | Socket | LGA1200 |
| 130 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
