In Deathloop, the Xeon E5-1650 v4 is slightly slower than the Xeon E5620. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Xeon E5-1650 v4
- Is 6 years and 3 months newer – Jun 20, 2016 vs Mar 16, 2010
- Is 6 years and 3 months newer
Xeon E5620
- Up to 1% faster in Deathloop – 222 vs 219 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in Deathloop
- Consumes up to 43% less energy – 80 vs 140 Watts
- Consumes up to 43% less energy
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Xeon E5-1650 v4 vs Xeon E5620: Comparison of performance and price
Xeon E5-1650 v4
Jun 20th, 2016
Average FPS
219 FPS
99%
Min 1% FPS
164 FPS
99%
Price, $
$455.76
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.08/FPS
100%
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E5-1650 v4 vs Xeon E5620 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E5-1650 v4 vs Xeon E5620 in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E5-1650 v4
Jun 20th, 2016
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
15 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
100%
Xeon E5620
Mar 16th, 2010
Cores
4-core
67%
L3 Cache
12 MB
80%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
67%
Turbo Frequency
2.666 GHz
67%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E5-1650 v4 Jun 20th, 2016 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon E5620 Mar 16th, 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2010 |
| $621.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| LGA2011-3 | Socket | LGA1366 |
| 140W | Power Consumption | 80W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2400 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | DDR3 |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
