In Rust, the Xeon E5-1650 v4 is slower than the Core Ultra 7 265F and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's $168 more expensive!
Xeon E5-1650 v4
No clear advantages
Core Ultra 7 265F
- Up to 24% faster in Rust – 278 vs 225 FPS
- Up to 24% faster in Rust
- Is 8 years and 6 months newer – Jan 07, 2025 vs Jun 20, 2016
- Is 8 years and 6 months newer
- Up to 37% cheaper – $288.00 vs $455.76
- Up to 37% cheaper
- Up to 49% better value in Rust – $1.03 vs $2.02/FPS
- Up to 49% better value in Rust
- Consumes up to 54% less energy – 65 vs 140 Watts
- Consumes up to 54% less energy
Rust FPS Calculator
Xeon E5-1650 v4 vs Core Ultra 7 265F: Comparison of performance and price
Xeon E5-1650 v4
Jun 20th, 2016
Average FPS
225 FPS
81%
Min 1% FPS
53 FPS
59%
Price, $
$455.76
63%
Value, $/FPS
$2.02/FPS
51%
Core Ultra 7 265F
Jan 7th, 2025
Average FPS
278 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
90 FPS
100%
Price, $
$288
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.03/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E5-1650 v4 vs Core Ultra 7 265F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E5-1650 v4 vs Core Ultra 7 265F in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E5-1650 v4
Jun 20th, 2016
Cores
6-core
30%
L3 Cache
15 MB
50%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
75%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
38%
Core Ultra 7 265F
Jan 7th, 2025
Cores
20-core
100%
L3 Cache
30 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
67%
Turbo Frequency
5.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
6400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E5-1650 v4 Jun 20th, 2016 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core Ultra 7 265F Jan 7th, 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jun 20th, 2016 | Released | Jan 7th, 2025 |
| $621.00 | MSRP | $379.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA2011-3 | Socket | LGA1851 |
| 140 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2400 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 6400 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
