In The Last of Us Part II, the Xeon E5-1650 v4 is slightly slower than the Core i7-930 and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's $148 more expensive!
Xeon E5-1650 v4
- Is 6 years and 3 months newer – Jun 20, 2016 vs Feb 28, 2010
- Is 6 years and 3 months newer
Core i7-930
- Up to 14% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 201 vs 176 FPS
- Up to 14% faster in The Last of Us Part II
- Up to 33% cheaper – $307.29 vs $455.76
- Up to 33% cheaper
- Up to 41% better value in The Last of Us Part II – $1.52 vs $2.58/FPS
- Up to 41% better value in The Last of Us Part II
- Consumes up to 7% less energy – 130 vs 140 Watts
- Consumes up to 7% less energy
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Xeon E5-1650 v4 vs Core i7-930: Comparison of performance and price
Xeon E5-1650 v4
Jun 20th, 2016
Average FPS
176 FPS
88%
Min 1% FPS
132 FPS
88%
Price, $
$455.76
67%
Value, $/FPS
$2.58/FPS
59%
Core i7-930
Feb 28th, 2010
Average FPS
201 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
150 FPS
100%
Price, $
$307.29
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.52/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E5-1650 v4 vs Core i7-930 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E5-1650 v4 vs Core i7-930 in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E5-1650 v4
Jun 20th, 2016
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
15 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
100%
Core i7-930
Feb 28th, 2010
Cores
4-core
67%
L3 Cache
8 MB
53%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
78%
Turbo Frequency
3.066 GHz
77%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E5-1650 v4 Jun 20th, 2016 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-930 Feb 28th, 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jun 20th, 2016 | Released | Feb 28th, 2010 |
| $621.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA2011-3 | Socket | LGA1366 |
| 140 W | Power Consumption | 130 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2400 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | DDR3 |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
