In Deathloop, the Xeon E5-1650 v4 is slightly slower than the Celeron 847. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Xeon E5-1650 v4
- Is 5 years and 1 day newer – Jun 20, 2016 vs Jun 19, 2011
- Is 5 years and 1 day newer
Celeron 847
- Up to 4% faster in Deathloop – 227 vs 219 FPS
- Up to 4% faster in Deathloop
- Consumes up to 88% less energy – 17 vs 140 Watts
- Consumes up to 88% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Xeon E5-1650 v4 vs Celeron 847: Comparison of performance and price
Xeon E5-1650 v4
Jun 20th, 2016
Average FPS
219 FPS
96%
Min 1% FPS
164 FPS
96%
Price, $
$455.76
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.08/FPS
100%
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E5-1650 v4 vs Celeron 847 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E5-1650 v4 vs Celeron 847 in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E5-1650 v4
Jun 20th, 2016
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
15 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
100%
Celeron 847
Jun 19th, 2011
Cores
2-core
33%
L3 Cache
2 MB
13%
Base Frequency
1.1 GHz
31%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E5-1650 v4 Jun 20th, 2016 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Celeron 847 Jun 19th, 2011 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | Jun 19th, 2011 |
| $621.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Laptop |
| LGA2011-3 | Socket | Intel BGA 1023 |
| 140W | Power Consumption | 17W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2400 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | DDR3 |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
