In The Last of Us Part II, the Xeon E5-1650 v3 is slightly faster than the Ryzen 9 9900X3D. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Xeon E5-1650 v3
- Up to 1% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 177 vs 175 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in The Last of Us Part II
Ryzen 9 9900X3D
- Is 10 years and 3 months newer – Jan 06, 2025 vs Sep 08, 2014
- Is 10 years and 3 months newer
- Consumes up to 14% less energy – 120 vs 140 Watts
- Consumes up to 14% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Xeon E5-1650 v3 vs Ryzen 9 9900X3D: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Ryzen 9 9900X3D
Jan 6th, 2025
Average FPS
175 FPS
99%
Min 1% FPS
131 FPS
99%
Price, $
$569
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.25/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E5-1650 v3 vs Ryzen 9 9900X3D in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E5-1650 v3 vs Ryzen 9 9900X3D in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E5-1650 v3
Sep 8th, 2014
Cores
6-core
50%
L3 Cache
15 MB
12%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
80%
Turbo Frequency
3.8 GHz
69%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
38%
Ryzen 9 9900X3D
Jan 6th, 2025
Cores
12-core
100%
L3 Cache
128 MB
100%
Base Frequency
4.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E5-1650 v3 Sep 8th, 2014 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen 9 9900X3D Jan 6th, 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 8th, 2014 | Released | Jan 6th, 2025 |
| – | MSRP | $599.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA2011-3 | Socket | AM5 |
| 140 W | Power Consumption | 120 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2133 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | Radeon Graphics |
| Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
