In Control, the Xeon E5-1650 v2 is slightly slower than the Ryzen 5 8400F and it's also a worse value for money, as it's $66 more expensive!
Xeon E5-1650 v2
No clear advantages
Ryzen 5 8400F
- Up to 3% faster in Control – 253 vs 246 FPS
- Up to 3% faster in Control
- Is 10 years and 6 months newer – Apr 01, 2024 vs Sep 10, 2013
- Is 10 years and 6 months newer
- Up to 29% cheaper – $164.35 vs $229.95
- Up to 29% cheaper
- Up to 31% better value in Control – $0.64 vs $0.93/FPS
- Up to 31% better value in Control
- Consumes up to 50% less energy – 65 vs 130 Watts
- Consumes up to 50% less energy
Control FPS Calculator
Xeon E5-1650 v2 vs Ryzen 5 8400F: Comparison of performance and price
Xeon E5-1650 v2
Sep 10th, 2013
Average FPS
246 FPS
97%
Min 1% FPS
161 FPS
98%
Price, $
$229.95
71%
Value, $/FPS
$0.93/FPS
69%
Ryzen 5 8400F
Apr 1st, 2024
Average FPS
253 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
165 FPS
100%
Price, $
$164.35
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.64/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E5-1650 v2 vs Ryzen 5 8400F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E5-1650 v2 vs Ryzen 5 8400F in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E5-1650 v2
Sep 10th, 2013
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
75%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
83%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
83%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
36%
Ryzen 5 8400F
Apr 1st, 2024
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
4.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E5-1650 v2 Sep 10th, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen 5 8400F Apr 1st, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 10th, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 1st, 2024 |
| – | MSRP | $170.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA2011 | Socket | AM5 |
| 130W | Power Consumption | 65W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1866 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 5200 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
