In Atomfall, the Xeon E5-1650 v2 is slower than the Core Ultra 5 245KF and it's also a worse value for money, as it's $15 more expensive!
Xeon E5-1650 v2
No clear advantages
Core Ultra 5 245KF
- Up to 26% faster in Atomfall – 246 vs 196 FPS
- Up to 26% faster in Atomfall
- Is 11 years and 1 month newer – Oct 24, 2024 vs Sep 10, 2013
- Is 11 years and 1 month newer
- Up to 7% cheaper – $214.99 vs $229.95
- Up to 7% cheaper
- Up to 26% better value in Atomfall – $0.87 vs $1.17/FPS
- Up to 26% better value in Atomfall
- Consumes up to 4% less energy – 125 vs 130 Watts
- Consumes up to 4% less energy
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Xeon E5-1650 v2 vs Core Ultra 5 245KF: Comparison of performance and price
Xeon E5-1650 v2
Sep 10th, 2013
Average FPS
196 FPS
80%
Min 1% FPS
147 FPS
80%
Price, $
$229.95
93%
Value, $/FPS
$1.17/FPS
74%
Core Ultra 5 245KF
Oct 24th, 2024
Average FPS
246 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
184 FPS
100%
Price, $
$214.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.87/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E5-1650 v2 vs Core Ultra 5 245KF in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E5-1650 v2 vs Core Ultra 5 245KF in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E5-1650 v2
Sep 10th, 2013
Cores
6-core
43%
L3 Cache
12 MB
50%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
83%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
75%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
29%
Core Ultra 5 245KF
Oct 24th, 2024
Cores
14-core
100%
L3 Cache
24 MB
100%
Base Frequency
4.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
6400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E5-1650 v2 Sep 10th, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core Ultra 5 245KF Oct 24th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 10th, 2013 | Released | Oct 24th, 2024 |
| – | MSRP | $294.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA2011 | Socket | LGA1851 |
| 130 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1866 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 6400 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
