In Atomfall, the Xeon E5-1650 v2 is slower than the Core i9-14900F. However, it's a better value for money, as it's $246 cheaper!
Xeon E5-1650 v2
- Up to 52% cheaper – $229.95 vs $476.00
- Up to 52% cheaper
- Up to 40% better value in Atomfall – $1.17 vs $1.94/FPS
- Up to 40% better value in Atomfall
Core i9-14900F
- Up to 25% faster in Atomfall – 245 vs 196 FPS
- Up to 25% faster in Atomfall
- Is 10 years and 3 months newer – Jan 08, 2024 vs Sep 10, 2013
- Is 10 years and 3 months newer
- Consumes up to 50% less energy – 65 vs 130 Watts
- Consumes up to 50% less energy
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Xeon E5-1650 v2 vs Core i9-14900F: Comparison of performance and price
Xeon E5-1650 v2
Sep 10th, 2013
Average FPS
196 FPS
80%
Min 1% FPS
147 FPS
80%
Price, $
$229.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.17/FPS
100%
Core i9-14900F
Jan 8th, 2024
Average FPS
245 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
184 FPS
100%
Price, $
$476
48%
Value, $/FPS
$1.94/FPS
60%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E5-1650 v2 vs Core i9-14900F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E5-1650 v2 vs Core i9-14900F in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E5-1650 v2
Sep 10th, 2013
Cores
6-core
25%
L3 Cache
12 MB
33%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
67%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
33%
Core i9-14900F
Jan 8th, 2024
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
57%
Turbo Frequency
5.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E5-1650 v2 Sep 10th, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-14900F Jan 8th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 10th, 2013 | Released | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| – | MSRP | $524.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA2011 | Socket | LGA1700 |
| 130 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1866 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
