In Rust, the Xeon E5-1650 v2 is slightly slower than the Core i7-9700F and it's also a slightly worse value for money, as it's only $17 cheaper!
Xeon E5-1650 v2
- Up to 7% cheaper – $229.95 vs $247.13
- Up to 7% cheaper
Core i7-9700F
- Up to 9% faster in Rust – 233 vs 214 FPS
- Up to 9% faster in Rust
- Is 5 years and 7 months newer – Apr 23, 2019 vs Sep 10, 2013
- Is 5 years and 7 months newer
- Up to 1% better value in Rust – $1.06 vs $1.07/FPS
- Up to 1% better value in Rust
- Consumes up to 50% less energy – 65 vs 130 Watts
- Consumes up to 50% less energy
Rust FPS Calculator
Xeon E5-1650 v2 vs Core i7-9700F: Comparison of performance and price
Xeon E5-1650 v2
Sep 10th, 2013
Average FPS
214 FPS
92%
Min 1% FPS
45 FPS
76%
Price, $
$229.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.07/FPS
99%
Core i7-9700F
Apr 23rd, 2019
Average FPS
233 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
59 FPS
100%
Price, $
$247.13
93%
Value, $/FPS
$1.06/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E5-1650 v2 vs Core i7-9700F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E5-1650 v2 vs Core i7-9700F in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E5-1650 v2
Sep 10th, 2013
Cores
6-core
75%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
83%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
70%
Core i7-9700F
Apr 23rd, 2019
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3 GHz
86%
Turbo Frequency
4.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E5-1650 v2 Sep 10th, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-9700F Apr 23rd, 2019 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 10th, 2013 | Released | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
| – | MSRP | $333.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA2011 | Socket | LGA1151 |
| 130 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1866 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
