In Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020, the Xeon E5-1650 v2 is slightly slower than the Core i5-7600T. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Xeon E5-1650 v2
No clear advantages
Core i5-7600T
- Up to 3% faster in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 – 98 vs 95 FPS
- Up to 3% faster in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
- Is 3 years and 3 months newer – Jan 03, 2017 vs Sep 10, 2013
- Is 3 years and 3 months newer
- Consumes up to 73% less energy – 35 vs 130 Watts
- Consumes up to 73% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 FPS Calculator
Xeon E5-1650 v2 vs Core i5-7600T: Comparison of performance and price
Xeon E5-1650 v2
Sep 10th, 2013
Average FPS
95 FPS
97%
Min 1% FPS
68 FPS
94%
Price, $
$229.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.42/FPS
100%
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E5-1650 v2 vs Core i5-7600T in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E5-1650 v2 vs Core i5-7600T in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E5-1650 v2
Sep 10th, 2013
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
78%
Core i5-7600T
Jan 3rd, 2017
Cores
4-core
67%
L3 Cache
6 MB
50%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
80%
Turbo Frequency
3.7 GHz
95%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E5-1650 v2 Sep 10th, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-7600T Jan 3rd, 2017 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 10th, 2013 | Released | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA2011 | Socket | LGA1151 |
| 130 W | Power Consumption | 35 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1866 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 2400 MHz (DDR4) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | HD 630 |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
