In Battlefield 6, the Xeon E5-1650 v2 is slightly slower than the Core i5-7300HQ. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Xeon E5-1650 v2
No clear advantages
Core i5-7300HQ
- Up to 6% faster in Battlefield 6 – 68 vs 64 FPS
- Up to 6% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 3 years and 3 months newer – Jan 03, 2017 vs Sep 10, 2013
- Is 3 years and 3 months newer
- Consumes up to 65% less energy – 45 vs 130 Watts
- Consumes up to 65% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Xeon E5-1650 v2 vs Core i5-7300HQ: Comparison of performance and price
Xeon E5-1650 v2
Sep 10th, 2013
Average FPS
64 FPS
94%
Min 1% FPS
48 FPS
94%
Price, $
$229.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.59/FPS
100%
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E5-1650 v2 vs Core i5-7300HQ in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E5-1650 v2 vs Core i5-7300HQ in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E5-1650 v2
Sep 10th, 2013
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
78%
Core i5-7300HQ
Jan 3rd, 2017
Cores
4-core
67%
L3 Cache
6 MB
50%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
71%
Turbo Frequency
3.5 GHz
90%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E5-1650 v2 Sep 10th, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-7300HQ Jan 3rd, 2017 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 10th, 2013 | Released | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
| – | MSRP | $250.00 |
Server | Segment | Laptop |
| LGA2011 | Socket | Intel BGA 1440 |
| 130 W | Power Consumption | 45 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1866 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | DDR3, 2400 MHz (DDR4) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | Intel HD Graphics 630 |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
