In Atomfall, the Xeon E5-1630 v4 is slower than the Core Ultra 7 265KF and it's also a worse value for money, as it's $14 more expensive!
Xeon E5-1630 v4
No clear advantages
Core Ultra 7 265KF
- Up to 20% faster in Atomfall – 248 vs 207 FPS
- Up to 20% faster in Atomfall
- Is 8 years and 4 months newer – Oct 24, 2024 vs Jun 20, 2016
- Is 8 years and 4 months newer
- Up to 5% cheaper – $284.99 vs $298.95
- Up to 5% cheaper
- Up to 21% better value in Atomfall – $1.14 vs $1.44/FPS
- Up to 21% better value in Atomfall
- Consumes up to 11% less energy – 125 vs 140 Watts
- Consumes up to 11% less energy
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Xeon E5-1630 v4 vs Core Ultra 7 265KF: Comparison of performance and price
Xeon E5-1630 v4
Jun 20th, 2016
Average FPS
207 FPS
83%
Min 1% FPS
155 FPS
83%
Price, $
$298.95
95%
Value, $/FPS
$1.44/FPS
79%
Core Ultra 7 265KF
Oct 24th, 2024
Average FPS
248 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
186 FPS
100%
Price, $
$284.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.14/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E5-1630 v4 vs Core Ultra 7 265KF in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E5-1630 v4 vs Core Ultra 7 265KF in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E5-1630 v4
Jun 20th, 2016
Cores
4-core
20%
L3 Cache
10 MB
33%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
95%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
73%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
38%
Core Ultra 7 265KF
Oct 24th, 2024
Cores
20-core
100%
L3 Cache
30 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.9 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
6400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E5-1630 v4 Jun 20th, 2016 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core Ultra 7 265KF Oct 24th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jun 20th, 2016 | Released | Oct 24th, 2024 |
| $406.00 | MSRP | $379.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA2011-3 | Socket | LGA1851 |
| 140 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2400 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 6400 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
