In Deathloop, the Xeon E5-1630 v3 is slightly slower than the Core i7-620M. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Xeon E5-1630 v3
- Is 4 years and 8 months newer – Sep 08, 2014 vs Jan 07, 2010
- Is 4 years and 8 months newer
Core i7-620M
- Up to 2% faster in Deathloop – 223 vs 219 FPS
- Up to 2% faster in Deathloop
- Consumes up to 75% less energy – 35 vs 140 Watts
- Consumes up to 75% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Xeon E5-1630 v3 vs Core i7-620M: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E5-1630 v3 vs Core i7-620M in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E5-1630 v3 vs Core i7-620M in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E5-1630 v3
Sep 8th, 2014
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
10 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
100%
Core i7-620M
Jan 7th, 2010
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
4 MB
40%
Base Frequency
2.677 GHz
72%
Turbo Frequency
3.333 GHz
88%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1066 MHz
50%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E5-1630 v3 Sep 8th, 2014 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-620M Jan 7th, 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Sep 8th, 2014 | Released | Jan 7th, 2010 |
| – | MSRP | $332.00 |
Server | Segment | Laptop |
| LGA2011-3 | Socket | Intel BGA 1288 |
| 140 W | Power Consumption | 35 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2133 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 1066 MHz (DDR3) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | HD Graphics (Ironlake) |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
