In Control, the Xeon E5-1620 is slightly slower than the Ryzen Threadripper 1920X and it's also a worse value for money, as it's $32 more expensive!
Xeon E5-1620
- Consumes up to 28% less energy – 130 vs 180 Watts
- Consumes up to 28% less energy
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Up to 1% faster in Control – 247 vs 245 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in Control
- Is 5 years and 5 months newer – Aug 10, 2017 vs Mar 06, 2012
- Is 5 years and 5 months newer
- Up to 14% cheaper – $199.99 vs $232.12
- Up to 14% cheaper
- Up to 15% better value in Control – $0.80 vs $0.94/FPS
- Up to 15% better value in Control
Control FPS Calculator
Xeon E5-1620 vs Ryzen Threadripper 1920X: Comparison of performance and price
Xeon E5-1620
Mar 6th, 2012
Average FPS
245 FPS
99%
Min 1% FPS
160 FPS
99%
Price, $
$232.12
86%
Value, $/FPS
$0.94/FPS
85%
![Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 Quad-core [4 Core] 3.50 GHz Processor - Socket LGA 2011-v3](https://howmanyfps.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/static/cpus/B01EA1QY04.jpg)
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
Aug 10th, 2017
Average FPS
247 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
162 FPS
100%
Price, $
$199.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.8/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E5-1620 vs Ryzen Threadripper 1920X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E5-1620 vs Ryzen Threadripper 1920X in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E5-1620
Mar 6th, 2012
Cores
4-core
33%
L3 Cache
10 MB
31%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.8 GHz
95%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
Aug 10th, 2017
Cores
12-core
100%
L3 Cache
32 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
97%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E5-1620 Mar 6th, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen Threadripper 1920X Aug 10th, 2017 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
| – | MSRP | $799.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA2011 | Socket | SP3r2 |
130W | Power Consumption | 180W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
