In Deathloop, the Xeon E5-1620 is same performance as the Ryzen 3 4100. However, it's a much worse value for money, as it's $164 more expensive!
Xeon E5-1620
No clear advantages
Ryzen 3 4100
- Is 10 years and 28 days newer – Apr 04, 2022 vs Mar 06, 2012
- Is 10 years and 28 days newer
- Up to 71% cheaper – $68.09 vs $232.12
- Up to 71% cheaper
- Up to 71% better value in Deathloop – $0.30 vs $1.05/FPS
- Up to 71% better value in Deathloop
- Consumes up to 50% less energy – 65 vs 130 Watts
- Consumes up to 50% less energy
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Xeon E5-1620 vs Ryzen 3 4100: Comparison of performance and price
Xeon E5-1620
Mar 6th, 2012
Average FPS
220 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
165 FPS
100%
Price, $
$232.12
29%
Value, $/FPS
$1.05/FPS
29%
![Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 Quad-core [4 Core] 3.50 GHz Processor - Socket LGA 2011-v3](https://howmanyfps.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/static/cpus/B01EA1QY04.jpg)
Ryzen 3 4100
Apr 4th, 2022
Average FPS
220 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
165 FPS
100%
Price, $
$68.09
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.3/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E5-1620 vs Ryzen 3 4100 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E5-1620 vs Ryzen 3 4100 in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E5-1620
Mar 6th, 2012
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
10 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
95%
Turbo Frequency
3.8 GHz
95%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Ryzen 3 4100
Apr 4th, 2022
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
80%
Base Frequency
3.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E5-1620 Mar 6th, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen 3 4100 Apr 4th, 2022 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 4th, 2022 |
| – | MSRP | $99.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA2011 | Socket | AM4 |
| 130W | Power Consumption | 65W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
