In Atomfall, the Xeon E5-1620 is slower than the Core Ultra 7 265KF, it's also the same value for money, as it's only $67 cheaper!
Xeon E5-1620
- Up to 22% cheaper – $232.12 vs $298.98
- Up to 22% cheaper
Core Ultra 7 265KF
- Up to 28% faster in Atomfall – 248 vs 193 FPS
- Up to 28% faster in Atomfall
- Is 12 years and 7 months newer – Oct 24, 2024 vs Mar 06, 2012
- Is 12 years and 7 months newer
- Consumes up to 4% less energy – 125 vs 130 Watts
- Consumes up to 4% less energy
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Xeon E5-1620 vs Core Ultra 7 265KF: Comparison of performance and price
Xeon E5-1620
Mar 6th, 2012
Average FPS
193 FPS
78%
Min 1% FPS
144 FPS
77%
Price, $
$232.12
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.2/FPS
100%
![Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 Quad-core [4 Core] 3.50 GHz Processor - Socket LGA 2011-v3](https://howmanyfps.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/static/cpus/B01EA1QY04.jpg)
Core Ultra 7 265KF
Oct 24th, 2024
Average FPS
248 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
186 FPS
100%
Price, $
$298.98
77%
Value, $/FPS
$1.2/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E5-1620 vs Core Ultra 7 265KF in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E5-1620 vs Core Ultra 7 265KF in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E5-1620
Mar 6th, 2012
Cores
4-core
20%
L3 Cache
10 MB
33%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
92%
Turbo Frequency
3.8 GHz
69%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core Ultra 7 265KF
Oct 24th, 2024
Cores
20-core
100%
L3 Cache
30 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.9 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
6400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E5-1620 Mar 6th, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core Ultra 7 265KF Oct 24th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Mar 6th, 2012 | Released | Oct 24th, 2024 |
| – | MSRP | $379.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA2011 | Socket | LGA1851 |
| 130 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 6400 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
