In Deathloop, the Xeon E5-1620 is same performance as the Core i5-680. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Xeon E5-1620
- Is 1 year and 10 months newer – Mar 06, 2012 vs Apr 19, 2010
- Is 1 year and 10 months newer
Core i5-680
- Consumes up to 44% less energy – 73 vs 130 Watts
- Consumes up to 44% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Xeon E5-1620 vs Core i5-680: Comparison of performance and price
Xeon E5-1620
Mar 6th, 2012
Average FPS
220 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
165 FPS
99%
Price, $
$232.12
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.05/FPS
100%
![Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 Quad-core [4 Core] 3.50 GHz Processor - Socket LGA 2011-v3](https://howmanyfps.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/static/cpus/B01EA1QY04.jpg)
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E5-1620 vs Core i5-680 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E5-1620 vs Core i5-680 in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E5-1620
Mar 6th, 2012
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
10 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.8 GHz
98%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i5-680
Apr 19th, 2010
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
4 MB
40%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.866 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1333 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E5-1620 Mar 6th, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-680 Apr 19th, 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2010 |
| – | MSRP | $294.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA2011 | Socket | LGA1156 |
| 130W | Power Consumption | 73W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 1333 MHz (DDR3) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | Intel HD |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
