In F1 22, the Xeon E5-1620 v4 is slightly slower than the Ryzen 9 5900X. However, it's a slightly better value for money, as it's $37 cheaper!
Xeon E5-1620 v4
- Up to 14% cheaper – $232.12 vs $269.00
- Up to 14% cheaper
- Up to 14% better value in F1 22 – $0.64 vs $0.74/FPS
- Up to 14% better value in F1 22
Ryzen 9 5900X
- Up to 1% faster in F1 22 – 361 vs 359 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in F1 22
- Is 4 years and 4 months newer – Nov 05, 2020 vs Jun 20, 2016
- Is 4 years and 4 months newer
- Consumes up to 25% less energy – 105 vs 140 Watts
- Consumes up to 25% less energy
F1 22 FPS Calculator
Xeon E5-1620 v4 vs Ryzen 9 5900X: Comparison of performance and price
Xeon E5-1620 v4
Jun 20th, 2016
Average FPS
359 FPS
99%
Min 1% FPS
247 FPS
98%
Price, $
$232.12
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.64/FPS
100%
![Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 Quad-core [4 Core] 3.50 GHz Processor - Socket LGA 2011-v3](https://howmanyfps.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/static/cpus/B01EA1QY04.jpg)
Ryzen 9 5900X
Nov 5th, 2020
Average FPS
361 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
252 FPS
100%
Price, $
$269
86%
Value, $/FPS
$0.74/FPS
86%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E5-1620 v4 vs Ryzen 9 5900X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E5-1620 v4 vs Ryzen 9 5900X in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E5-1620 v4
Jun 20th, 2016
Cores
4-core
33%
L3 Cache
10 MB
16%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
95%
Turbo Frequency
3.8 GHz
79%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
75%
Ryzen 9 5900X
Nov 5th, 2020
Cores
12-core
100%
L3 Cache
64 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E5-1620 v4 Jun 20th, 2016 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen 9 5900X Nov 5th, 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | Nov 5th, 2020 |
$294.00 | MSRP | $549.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA2011-3 | Socket | AM4 |
| 140W | Power Consumption | 105W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2400 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
