In Battlefield 6, the Xeon E5-1620 v4 is quite a bit slower than the Core i5-12600KF. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Xeon E5-1620 v4
No clear advantages
Core i5-12600KF
- Up to 60% faster in Battlefield 6 – 112 vs 70 FPS
- Up to 60% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 5 years and 4 months newer – Nov 04, 2021 vs Jun 20, 2016
- Is 5 years and 4 months newer
- Consumes up to 11% less energy – 125 vs 140 Watts
- Consumes up to 11% less energy
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Xeon E5-1620 v4 vs Core i5-12600KF: Comparison of performance and price
Xeon E5-1620 v4
Jun 20th, 2016
Average FPS
70 FPS
62%
Min 1% FPS
53 FPS
63%
Price, $
$232.12
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.31/FPS
100%
![Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 Quad-core [4 Core] 3.50 GHz Processor - Socket LGA 2011-v3](https://howmanyfps.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/static/cpus/B01EA1QY04.jpg)
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E5-1620 v4 vs Core i5-12600KF in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E5-1620 v4 vs Core i5-12600KF in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E5-1620 v4
Jun 20th, 2016
Cores
4-core
40%
L3 Cache
10 MB
50%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
95%
Turbo Frequency
3.8 GHz
78%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
50%
Core i5-12600KF
Nov 4th, 2021
Cores
10-core
100%
L3 Cache
20 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.9 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E5-1620 v4 Jun 20th, 2016 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-12600KF Nov 4th, 2021 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jun 20th, 2016 | Released | Nov 4th, 2021 |
| $294.00 | MSRP | $264.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA2011-3 | Socket | LGA1700 |
| 140 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2400 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
