In Atomfall, the Xeon E5-1620 v3 is slower than the Core i9-14900KF. However, it's a better value for money, as it's $240 cheaper!
Xeon E5-1620 v3
- Up to 56% cheaper – $189.95 vs $429.99
- Up to 56% cheaper
- Up to 46% better value in Atomfall – $0.93 vs $1.73/FPS
- Up to 46% better value in Atomfall
Core i9-14900KF
- Up to 22% faster in Atomfall – 248 vs 203 FPS
- Up to 22% faster in Atomfall
- Is 9 years and 1 month newer – Oct 17, 2023 vs Sep 08, 2014
- Is 9 years and 1 month newer
- Consumes up to 11% less energy – 125 vs 140 Watts
- Consumes up to 11% less energy
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Xeon E5-1620 v3 vs Core i9-14900KF: Comparison of performance and price
Xeon E5-1620 v3
Sep 8th, 2014
Average FPS
203 FPS
82%
Min 1% FPS
152 FPS
82%
Price, $
$189.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.93/FPS
100%
Core i9-14900KF
Oct 17th, 2023
Average FPS
248 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
186 FPS
100%
Price, $
$429.99
44%
Value, $/FPS
$1.73/FPS
54%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E5-1620 v3 vs Core i9-14900KF in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E5-1620 v3 vs Core i9-14900KF in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E5-1620 v3
Sep 8th, 2014
Cores
4-core
17%
L3 Cache
10 MB
28%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.6 GHz
60%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
38%
Core i9-14900KF
Oct 17th, 2023
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
91%
Turbo Frequency
6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E5-1620 v3 Sep 8th, 2014 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-14900KF Oct 17th, 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 8th, 2014 | Released | Oct 17th, 2023 |
| – | MSRP | $564.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA2011-3 | Socket | LGA1700 |
| 140 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2133 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
