In Manor Lords, the Xeon E5-1620 v3 is slower than the Core i9-12900T. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Xeon E5-1620 v3
No clear advantages
Core i9-12900T
- Up to 20% faster in Manor Lords – 215 vs 179 FPS
- Up to 20% faster in Manor Lords
- Is 7 years and 3 months newer – Jan 04, 2022 vs Sep 08, 2014
- Is 7 years and 3 months newer
- Consumes up to 75% less energy – 35 vs 140 Watts
- Consumes up to 75% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Manor Lords FPS Calculator
Xeon E5-1620 v3 vs Core i9-12900T: Comparison of performance and price
Xeon E5-1620 v3
Sep 8th, 2014
Average FPS
179 FPS
83%
Min 1% FPS
127 FPS
87%
Price, $
$189.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.06/FPS
100%
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E5-1620 v3 vs Core i9-12900T in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E5-1620 v3 vs Core i9-12900T in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E5-1620 v3
Sep 8th, 2014
Cores
4-core
25%
L3 Cache
10 MB
33%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.6 GHz
73%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
44%
Core i9-12900T
Jan 4th, 2022
Cores
16-core
100%
L3 Cache
30 MB
100%
Base Frequency
1.4 GHz
40%
Turbo Frequency
4.9 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E5-1620 v3 Sep 8th, 2014 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-12900T Jan 4th, 2022 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 8th, 2014 | Released | Jan 4th, 2022 |
| – | MSRP | $489.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA2011-3 | Socket | LGA1700 |
| 140 W | Power Consumption | 35 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2133 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 770 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
