In Rust, the Xeon E5-1620 v3 is slower than the Core i7-14700F. However, it's a better value for money, as it's $113 cheaper!
Xeon E5-1620 v3
- Up to 37% cheaper – $189.95 vs $302.97
- Up to 37% cheaper
- Up to 22% better value in Rust – $0.86 vs $1.10/FPS
- Up to 22% better value in Rust
Core i7-14700F
- Up to 25% faster in Rust – 273 vs 219 FPS
- Up to 25% faster in Rust
- Is 9 years and 4 months newer – Jan 08, 2024 vs Sep 08, 2014
- Is 9 years and 4 months newer
- Consumes up to 54% less energy – 65 vs 140 Watts
- Consumes up to 54% less energy
Rust FPS Calculator
Xeon E5-1620 v3 vs Core i7-14700F: Comparison of performance and price
Xeon E5-1620 v3
Sep 8th, 2014
Average FPS
219 FPS
80%
Min 1% FPS
50 FPS
57%
Price, $
$189.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.86/FPS
100%
Core i7-14700F
Jan 8th, 2024
Average FPS
273 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
87 FPS
100%
Price, $
$302.97
62%
Value, $/FPS
$1.1/FPS
78%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E5-1620 v3 vs Core i7-14700F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E5-1620 v3 vs Core i7-14700F in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E5-1620 v3
Sep 8th, 2014
Cores
4-core
20%
L3 Cache
10 MB
30%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.6 GHz
67%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
38%
Core i7-14700F
Jan 8th, 2024
Cores
20-core
100%
L3 Cache
33 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.1 GHz
60%
Turbo Frequency
5.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E5-1620 v3 Sep 8th, 2014 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-14700F Jan 8th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 8th, 2014 | Released | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| – | MSRP | $359.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA2011-3 | Socket | LGA1700 |
| 140 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2133 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
