In The Last of Us Part II, the Xeon E5-1620 v3 is slightly faster than the Core i7-13700K. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Xeon E5-1620 v3
- Up to 5% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 179 vs 170 FPS
- Up to 5% faster in The Last of Us Part II
Core i7-13700K
- Is 8 years and 19 days newer – Sep 27, 2022 vs Sep 08, 2014
- Is 8 years and 19 days newer
- Consumes up to 11% less energy – 125 vs 140 Watts
- Consumes up to 11% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Xeon E5-1620 v3 vs Core i7-13700K: Comparison of performance and price
Xeon E5-1620 v3
Sep 8th, 2014
Average FPS
179 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
134 FPS
100%
Price, $
$189.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.06/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E5-1620 v3 vs Core i7-13700K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E5-1620 v3 vs Core i7-13700K in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E5-1620 v3
Sep 8th, 2014
Cores
4-core
25%
L3 Cache
10 MB
33%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.6 GHz
67%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
38%
Core i7-13700K
Sep 27th, 2022
Cores
16-core
100%
L3 Cache
30 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
97%
Turbo Frequency
5.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E5-1620 v3 Sep 8th, 2014 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-13700K Sep 27th, 2022 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 8th, 2014 | Released | Sep 27th, 2022 |
| – | MSRP | $409.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA2011-3 | Socket | LGA1700 |
| 140 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2133 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 770 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
