In Deathloop, the Xeon E5-1620 v3 is slightly slower than the Core i7-12700K. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Xeon E5-1620 v3
No clear advantages
Core i7-12700K
- Up to 8% faster in Deathloop – 235 vs 218 FPS
- Up to 8% faster in Deathloop
- Is 7 years and 1 month newer – Nov 04, 2021 vs Sep 08, 2014
- Is 7 years and 1 month newer
- Consumes up to 11% less energy – 125 vs 140 Watts
- Consumes up to 11% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Xeon E5-1620 v3 vs Core i7-12700K: Comparison of performance and price
Xeon E5-1620 v3
Sep 8th, 2014
Average FPS
218 FPS
93%
Min 1% FPS
164 FPS
93%
Price, $
$189.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.87/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E5-1620 v3 vs Core i7-12700K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E5-1620 v3 vs Core i7-12700K in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E5-1620 v3
Sep 8th, 2014
Cores
4-core
33%
L3 Cache
10 MB
40%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
97%
Turbo Frequency
3.6 GHz
72%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
44%
Core i7-12700K
Nov 4th, 2021
Cores
12-core
100%
L3 Cache
25 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E5-1620 v3 Sep 8th, 2014 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-12700K Nov 4th, 2021 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 8th, 2014 | Released | Nov 4th, 2021 |
| – | MSRP | $409.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA2011-3 | Socket | LGA1700 |
| 140 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2133 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 770 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
