In Atomfall, the Xeon E5-1620 v3 is slightly slower than the Core i7-11700F. However, it's a slightly better value for money, as it's $46 cheaper!
Xeon E5-1620 v3
- Up to 20% cheaper – $189.95 vs $235.99
- Up to 20% cheaper
- Up to 10% better value in Atomfall – $0.94 vs $1.04/FPS
- Up to 10% better value in Atomfall
Core i7-11700F
- Up to 12% faster in Atomfall – 226 vs 202 FPS
- Up to 12% faster in Atomfall
- Is 6 years and 6 months newer – Mar 16, 2021 vs Sep 08, 2014
- Is 6 years and 6 months newer
- Consumes up to 54% less energy – 65 vs 140 Watts
- Consumes up to 54% less energy
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Xeon E5-1620 v3 vs Core i7-11700F: Comparison of performance and price
Xeon E5-1620 v3
Sep 8th, 2014
Average FPS
202 FPS
89%
Min 1% FPS
151 FPS
89%
Price, $
$189.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.94/FPS
100%
Core i7-11700F
Mar 16th, 2021
Average FPS
226 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
169 FPS
100%
Price, $
$235.99
80%
Value, $/FPS
$1.04/FPS
90%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E5-1620 v3 vs Core i7-11700F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E5-1620 v3 vs Core i7-11700F in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E5-1620 v3
Sep 8th, 2014
Cores
4-core
50%
L3 Cache
10 MB
62%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.6 GHz
73%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
67%
Core i7-11700F
Mar 16th, 2021
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
71%
Turbo Frequency
4.9 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E5-1620 v3 Sep 8th, 2014 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-11700F Mar 16th, 2021 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 8th, 2014 | Released | Mar 16th, 2021 |
| – | MSRP | $298.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA2011-3 | Socket | LGA1200 |
| 140 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2133 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
